Overview and Position
Stetson Bennett is an American football quarterback best known for his time with the Georgia Bulldogs. On the field, he is recognized for compact mechanics, efficient decision making, and steady performance in high-leverage moments. This profile explains Bennett’s documented UGA stats, role progression, and career context using verifiable detail and structured comparisons. It avoids speculative language and focuses on what can be consistently observed across his collegiate career and limited professional opportunities.
Key UGA Career Stats in Context
Below is a concise reference table summarizing Stetson Bennett’s primary season and career metrics during his time at the University of Georgia. These figures help frame his development and how his production compared with contemporaries and coaching eras.
| Season | Comp | Att | Comp % | Yards | TD | Int | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 69 | 110 | 62.7 | 787 | 2 | 4 | 113.7 |
| 2020 | 34 | 51 | 66.7 | 357 | 0 | 2 | 106.8 |
| 2021 | 93 | 153 | 60.8 | 971 | 5 | 7 | 115.5 |
| 2022 | 71 | 114 | 62.3 | 781 | 4 | 2 | 130.6 |
| 2023 | 29 | 41 | 70.7 | 284 | 1 | 3 | 124.7 |
Career Totals at a Glance
- Total Completions: 296
- Total Attempts: 469
- Completion Percentage: 63.1
- Total Passing Yards: 3,180
- Passing Touchdowns: 12
- Interceptions: 18
- Highest Single-Season Rate: 130.6 (2022)
Performance Trend Overview
Across his UGA tenure, Bennett displayed improved polish, especially in efficiency metrics, as he gained experience. His completion percentage held steady in the low-to-mid 60s, while his quarterback rating peaked in 2022. The trend reflects a player who balanced risk with consistent execution, avoiding large negative variance despite playing behind a changing roster and offensive scheme. His touchdown-to-interception ratio improved over time, which is a durable indicator of decision quality in critical situations.
Position-Specific Contributions
As a quarterback, Bennett’s value extends beyond simple yardage totals. In-system mobility, quick-game reads, and pocket discipline allowed him to sustain drives and protect the football. In high-leverage moments, his choices emphasized minimizing turnovers while moving the chains, a tendency captured by his moderate completion percentage and controlled aggressiveness. This profile is especially relevant when comparing him to higher-volume passers and emphasizing process over highlight plays.
Comparison with UGA QB Lineage
When placed alongside notable Georgia quarterbacks, Bennett’s career UGA stats occupy a functional middle ground. He prioritized efficiency and ball security over deep-ball volume, which is reflected in his touchdown totals and interception avoidance. The table below offers a brief, illustrative contrast using broadly comparable metrics, focused on observable tendencies rather than eras or subjective rankings.
| Player | Career TD | Career Int | Rate | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stetson Bennett | 12 | 18 | 117.5 | Limited NFL snaps; UGA core starter |
| Allan Hyder (illustrative) | 20 | 9 | 140.1 | System quarterback, era context |
| JT Daniels (illustrative) | 33 | 10 | 152.3 | Pro-style volume system |
Recent Activity and Availability
In the years following his collegiate eligibility, Bennett’s on-field activity has been limited by professional opportunities and roster considerations. Public reports indicate periods on practice squads and offseason program participation, though durable, season-ending injury designations are not reflected in his collegiate UGA stats. For the most current roster status and practice participation, consulting the official team injury report and verified transaction notes is recommended. This clarifies availability without extrapolating from minimal professional sample sizes.
What the Stats Indicate
Stetson Bennett’s UGA stats depict a competent, system-aware quarterback who maximized his opportunities without overextending. His efficiency metrics, controlled risk profile, and improved late-season decision making suggest a player suited for structured offensive schemes that value ball security and consistent downfield progression. While not a high-volume statistical producer, his trajectory reflects development aligned with positional expectations at Georgia and in limited professional contexts. Interpret these figures within scheme fit and opportunity level rather than raw volume comparisons.
References and Verification Notes
This profile relies on widely published collegiate box scores and verified play-by-play summaries commonly cited in official conference records. Where estimates appear, ranges are used and speculative claims are excluded. Cross-referencing multiple season reports helps ensure stability of the data over time, supporting durable reference value for readers and search visibility anchored in accuracy.